Tuesday, March 16, 2010

Is it not criminal for Al Gore to be preaching false storm data proving need for carbon trading (and Goldman Sachs)?

The claim about increased storms by Gore and the UN was never published or reviewed, per the TimesOnline UK, 1/24/10. Anyone who read the report could have seen this in plain site, nothing esoteric. The public generally is unaware of this giant fraud because
  • the US media refuses to report it.
  • UK Times: "The Sunday Times has since found that the scientific paper on which the IPCC based its claim had not been peer reviewed, nor published, at the time the climate body issued its report.
  • When the paper was eventually published, in 2008, it had a new caveat. It said: "We find insufficient evidence to claim a statistical relationship between global temperature increase and catastrophe losses."
  • Despite this change the IPCC did not issue a clarification ahead of the Copenhagen climate summit last month.

It has also emerged that at least two scientific reviewers who checked drafts of the IPCC report urged greater caution in proposing a link between climate change and disaster impacts —

  • If this isn't criminal fraud that Gore is allowed to push, against the American people, what is? (ed).
"If there’s a drought – it’s global warming. When there’s a hurricane – it’s global warming. If there are heavy snows or even blizzards – it’s somehow global warming. And amazingly, the latest round of rainy and windy weather in the Northeast, well that’s consistent with this phenomenon as well, so says former Vice President Al Gore.

[T]he odds have shifted toward much larger downpours,” Gore said. “And we have seen that happen in the Northeast, we’ve seen it happen in the Northwest – in both of those regions are among those that scientists have predicted for a long time would begin to experience much larger downpours.”

More from TimesOnline UK, 1/24/10 about false storms claim used to get money from Americans and permanently enslave them:
  • "The claim by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), that global warming is already affecting the severity and frequency of global disasters, has since become
embedded in political and public debate.
  • It was central to discussions at last month's Copenhagen climate summit, including a demand by developing countries for compensation
  • of $100 billion (£62 billion) from the rich nations blamed for creating the most emissions.

Ed Miliband, the energy and climate change minister, has suggested British and overseas floods — such as those in Bangladesh in 2007 — could be linked to global warming.

  • Barack Obama, the US president, said last autumn: "More powerful storms and floods threaten every continent."...
Reference, "UN Wrongly linked global warming to natural disasters," by Jonathan Leake,
via Tom Nelson

No comments: